What about it?

my opinion about Schiller's letter in the Aesthatic Education of Man

 
based on the paragraph one from schiller letter, my conclusion is based on what schiller researches on beauty and art. schiller treat a subject which is closely connected with the better portion of happiness and not far removed from the moral nobility of human nature. Beautiful before a heart which whole power is felt and exercised and make it difficult part because one is compelled to appeal as frequently to as to principles. That's mean if we feel something is beauty, we will treat the subject with nice and well. Schiller also write in his letter about beauty ,beauty sometimes is not original. Sometimes, the part of beauty is something that look beauty because it effect from something near the subject. based on the word schiller in his letter '' their innate feebleness than sustain themselves by borrowed authority and foreign supportt'' this means the subject can look beauty beause of it surround area. Some artist get the meaning of beauty aand art becouse of their experiment  from outside world and trough their journey. the experient they have is not include in other book. with experient, anyone have different judgement about beauty. furthermore, they always use something that happen in their life to know what the meaning of beauty.

  It seems that unseasonable find aesthetic symbol of the world, and when we presents the moral question of interest even though a lot higher, and when the spirit of philosophical thought that a hard challenge to the circumstances of the time occupied himself with the perfect of all works of art with the establishment and the structure of real freedom.It is not satisfactory to live from the age of private and work for other times. We must also be members of our era and well as of our state or country. If you imagine that to be improper and illegal, even for a man to isolate himself from the customs and manners of the circle in which they live, it will be not inconsistent to believe that it is his duty also to give the share of the proper effect. Art has to leave reality, we should raise ourself from  above physical necessity and want, for art is the daughter of freedom, and they need to recipes and rules furnished by the need for a spiritual and not by that of matter.

    When a man is lifted from his slumber in the senses, and said he felt as a man, he explores his surroundings, and finds that in the case. Presented in this case, by the power of circumstances, before he could determine his position freely. But the moral object can not possibly rest satisfied with the political condition forced upon him by necessity, are calculated only for this condition, and that it would be unfortunate if this did not convince him. In many cases man shakes off this law blind to the need, through his spontaneous free, which among many other things we have seen, in the noblest of its beauty and suppressing by moral influence on the strong push by him planted in the nature in the passion of love .

    It may be hard  everyone to carry a man, within himself, at least in his adaptation and destination, a purely ideal man. The big problem of existence is to make all the changes that life does not stop the outside in accordance with national unity fixed for this ideal. When the mechanical artist places his hand on the formless block, to give it the form and according to his intention, he did not do any scruples in the violence for it. The nature of the work does not deserve any respect in itself, and there is no value for the whole of its parts. When a child is in the Fine Arts puts his hand on the same block, he has no scruples either in doing violence to it, he avoids all shows of this violence. The child does  not respect this issue in which it operates, and more mechanical artist, but he seeks by looking clear so as to deceive the eye, which takes the matter under its protection. 

  Other thah that, man paints himself in his actions, and what is conceived in the form of drama at the moment? One hand, and he is running wild, on the other hand in a dormant state, and two extremest stages of human decadence, both seen in one and the same period. On the other hand, the layers of civilization give us a disgusting scene is still more than sleep, and the corruption of character which is the more revolting because it roots in the culture. I forget which of the philosophers in recent times or more senior than schiller makes this observation, that what is more noble is more revolting in its destruction. The remark applies with truth to the world of ethics. Child of Nature, and when the collapse, and becomes a madman, but in the art world, and when the collapse, and it becomes personal without basis.